Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Danish: Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler) is an work by. One of the most noteworthy features of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide is that it lives up to its subtitle.
|Published (Last):||24 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||7.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Piety persuasively supports her conclusion with a detailed analysis of the different senses of truth at work in the Postscript.
Write a customer review. Swenson and Walter Lowrie Princeton: It does not, however, mean that Kierkegaard rejects the existence of objective norms.
Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature. And a second great merit of Hannay’s Postscript is that it addresses them head-on, in a lucid Introduction.
The Christian faith lies rather in the leap in the face of absurdity, in the “offense” it makes to common sense. Read more Read less. Views Read Edit View history. Purdue UP,p. The first contribution from M. According to Climacus, all objective knowledge is subject to doubt.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript by Søren Kierkegaard
The object is the truth. His virtue, for the reader, is that he sees the way to the top, kierjegaard his value depends on his not having got there; for then he would have disappeared from view” xvii.
The question as to whether Kierkegaard was an existentialist was brought up by Libuse Lukas Miller. Please try again later. He says “a logical system is possible, but an existential system is impossible. He does not mean that anyone can create whatever he likes and then claim it to be the truth. It was as alien as it could possibly be to my nature to want to terrify others, and therefore I both sadly and perhaps also a bit proudly found my joy in comforting others and in being gentleness undcientific to them-hiding the terror in my own interior being.
Paperbackpages. However, unlike his other pseudonymous works, Kierkegaard attaches his name as editor to this work, showing the importance of the Kiedkegaard to Kierkegaard’s overall authorship.
Michael Condran rated it it was amazing Aug 27, Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Is it more essential that a prayer be genuine with regard to matters of “objective” concern — i. Focuses on what is asserted. The necessity of this leap is what gives offense to man and to all human idealism.
An absolutely masterful exposition of the subject’s relation to unscentific religious.
S. Kierkegaard Concluding Unscientific | Valentina Cizmar –
The work is also famous for its dictum, Subjectivity is Truth. Therefore, the philosopher does not ignore, nor does he deny, the science, abstraction, or the logic of objectivity.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Showing of 19 reviews. As Mooney puts it, Farewells are exchanged in the confidence that the sun will rise, that we will awake, that the world will return, that our friends will not enter the grave in the night — even as we know that a final farewell awaits, when there will be no tomorrow, when we will not awake, when the beloved will not return May 17, Artur Olczyk rated it really liked it.
And Kierkegaard himself should not be called the father of modern existentialism. What is required in order to go beyond Socratic recollection of eternal ideas already possessed by the unscientificc His attitude is amplified by a direct contact with a reader; the philosopher talks to each of us individually This emphasis of individualisation is also present in the Hegelian Left – L.
I will ammend that, because dialectics are not really the art of uncertainty, but of reconciling uncertainty with certainty while not sacrificing either–and sincerity is required if the formula for a synthesis is to have any elegance.
In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the question: But his Danish critic attacked him for being the most consistent system-builder among system-builders. Jen rated it it was amazing Jul 14, For sure, Kierkegaard does say that truth involves, even necessarily, a degree of “objective uncertainty”, namely that, objectively speaking, that which one believes to be the truth may well turn out This book is mostly known through its central claim that “truth is subjectivity”.
Everything is relative, they say, but at the same time they declare as indubitable truth that the mind is nothing but a product of cerebral processes.
Their books remain indispensable tools for the scholar. Amber rated it really liked it Jan 28, Examples abound, but I have room for only one. These puzzles are thick and knotted.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Sep 04, Dan rated it it was amazing. The second volume contains the scholarly apparatus, including a key to references and selected entries from Kierkegaard’s journals and papers. How can we tell, the Postscript asks, when a prayer to God is authentic? It discusses Christianity’s content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula understanding is revocationn, As the title suggests, the Postscript is sequel to the earlier Philosophical Fragments.
Refresh and try again. If a second edition is issued, I suggest that such references be added. Also, he was a vehement critic of the Church, fighting its fanatic dogmatism and self-grandiosity. It also means opposition to the system as a whole: