Written in by Leopoldina Fortunati, this rigorous account of reproductive labor under capitalism has long been underappreciated within. The Arcane of Reproduction Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital by Leopoldina Fortunati. Reviewed by Kersplebedeb. This is important. Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital [Leopoldina Fortunati] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. One of Italy’s.
|Country:||Sao Tome and Principe|
|Published (Last):||15 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||5.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Women are tending to ask for more than “love” in their relationships with men. It is so much like work that it ought to be paid and in fact often is. Of course, this cost for capitalism is reproduchion than made up for by the incredible benefits it gets ldopoldina the exploitation of women both in the family and in the lowest paying jobs, both of which come as part of the same big patriarchal package deal.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. From the viewpoint of the leoooldina class being productive simply means being exploited… Ultimately when we say that we produce capital, we say that we can and want to destroy it, rather than engage in a losing battle to move from one form and degree of exploitation to another.
For example, when thinking about the social structure of communist China, specifically when there was limit on the number of children a family could have, there is a higher value placed on boys and men.
Here she makes the initial distinction between housework and production, the latter being directly productive and mediated through production relations specific to capitalist society. This work will inevitably fall upon women, because as Fortunati has demonstrated, work outside of direct market mediation is biologically assigned to women. Karl Marx, CapitalVolume 2trans.
A basic example not explicitly used but is expressed through this essay is the ideological factors that support what a normal life is. Chonti Valenzuela leopolrina rated it it was amazing Mar 03, Whether just in the form of a demand, or through recognition won through the institution of that perhaps impossible demand, its function was to rid gendered exploitation of its emotional connotations, and thus combat the structural ,eopoldina of reproductive labor in capitalist social relations.
Karl Marx, CapitalVolume 1trans. I don’t think she’s wrong about reproduction being the non-value that produces value, but there are only small hints near the end of what would have made this book exciting and complete to me.
If you can get through Part One, Part Two seems to go a lot easier. This exchange and relation is required because the female houseworker’s reproduction cannot fortuati consist of the use-values into which the wage can be transformed; it must also include the consumption of use-values which only the husband can and must produce.
Which explains for instance why there is oftentimes grassroots working class opposition, especially amongst women, to child-marriage, child prostitution, the employment of children in sweatshops, child conscription, etc.
Although many people conceptually would not think of reprlduction a child as continuing the human race, in a way capitalism treats the creation of a child as production. On the one hand, many of today’s prostitutes are also housewives and vice versa, dortunati such a fortujati that passing between the housework and sexwork market–between one productive sector and another–has become very elastic.
For instance, workers in a factory create a commodity to sell or trade which thus is production. A formal economic explanation of reproductive labor, complete with equations. Fortunati seemed to have forgotten to include when composing this.
Quotes from The Arcane of Reproduction
Autonomedia, This is not to say that housewives do not also work for wages, and that breadwinners win all of the bread. There is, on the other hand, an understanding of provincialization as a stretching that underlines the need for an extension and displacement of the borders …. Rebecca rated it really liked it Feb 17, This is not foreign to Marxism; it is instead a portion of the circuit of reproduction left open-ended.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. All family members–even within the “love” of the family–are not protected from but remain subject to capital’s will and discipline.
Notify me of new comments via email. Similarly, factory women were considered in need of special protection, not for their own sake primarily but for the good of the race.
While i know that there is an element of truth, a factual insight of sorts, in this way of seeing things [ 1 ], it begs as many questions as it answers, for instance there is no discussion of how this labour sex work is different than other activities that make people feel reprdouction or relieve their stress i.
Lobna rated it it reprofuction amazing Dec 17, Arguments that snap together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, only to give a badly distorted image. The book is heavily influenced by Marx’s theory that “It is the posting of reproduction as non-value that enables both production and reproduction to function as the production of value.
The Gendered Circuit: Reading The Arcane of Reproduction – Viewpoint Magazine
Nor do i mean to suggest that the only way to solve these problems is by abolishing capitalism, nor that the abholition of capitalism will automatically solve them. This elasticity has also come about tue consequence of women making more cash-oriented as opposed to goods-oriented agreements with men. I was left wondering whether the points she makes require a whole book or if they could have just been explained in a single, shorter piece of writing.
Palgrave Macmillan, This makes the reading not only boring, but also fairly repetitive.
Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital
The theorists of the Wages leopolcina Housework movement, as a revolutionary feminist struggle, were more aware of this than anyone. On arcaje one side, there is the state, and on the other, the male worker. Patrick rated it really liked it Aug 17, As i admited before, as unfamiliar as i am with much of the terminology, i am not really a good judge of whether she succeeds or not, and this does not really concern me, as i already agreed with this position beforehand.
That she manages to bring this hostile strand of academic marxian theory to bear on these questions, even if she may at times have to drag it kicking and screaming, is impressive. The Arcane of Reproduction does two important racane in defining the theoretical foundation of the Wages for Housework movement.